MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078239730 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/5/017

Galilean covariant theories for Bargmann–Wigner fields with arbitrary spin

2007· article· en· W2078239730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCovariant transformationGalileanMathematical physicsSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsGalilean invarianceMathematicsClassical mechanicsTheoretical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct Lagrangians for non-relativistic massive fields with arbitrary spin. We use a Bargmann–Wigner construction, together with a Galilean covariant approach based on the reduction from an extended (4, 1) Minkowski manifold to the Galilean (3, 1) spacetime. Fierz identities are developed within this framework. By using symmetric spinor fields of rank 2 and rank 3, we can avoid the difficulty arising from the introduction of the minimal electromagnetic interaction in the Bargmann–Wigner wave equations. For fields with spin S, the minimal electromagnetic coupling thereby leads to the gyromagnetic ratio gS = 1/S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it