MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078633960 · doi:10.3138/md.50.3.325

Ghosts from an Imperfect Place: Philip Ridley’s Nostalgia

2007· article· en· W2078633960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryImperfectLiteratureArtAestheticsArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characters of Philip Ridley’s plays are sick with nostalgia. Ridley’s three major works from the 1990s serve as powerful reminders of nostalgia’s origins as a physical affliction caused by an acute longing for home and the past. The characters of The Pitchfork Disney (1991) and The Fastest Clock in the Universe (1992) are so enamoured of fictions of the past that they go to violent ends to preserve them. The recurrence of nostalgia in Ridley’s plays reflects larger, ongoing debates about nostalgia in British culture, from Thatcher’s call for a return to Victorian values to the rise of Tony Blair’s New Labour party and its championing of Cool Britannia, which looked backed to 1960s Swinging London as its model. Yet, in his final play of the decade, Ghost from a Perfect Place (1994), Ridley suggests that the cure for nostalgia is perhaps nostalgia itself. That is, the recognition of nostalgia can serve as a means of transforming it from a purely retrospective gesture into a prospective one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it