MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gas-phase syntheses for interstellar carboxylic and amino acids

2003· article· en· W2078669992 on OpenAlexaff
Voislav Blagojevic, Simon Petrie, Diethard K. Böhme

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrochemistryPropanoic acidHydroxylamineProtonationMeteoriteAcetic acidPhysicsInterstellar mediumAlanineGlycineMoleculeContext (archaeology)Amino acidAstrobiologyIonChemistryOrganic chemistryAstrophysicsBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report experimental results that demonstrate gas-phase, ionic syntheses of glycine and β-alanine, as well as acetic and propanoic acid, from smaller molecules found in space; in doing so, we infer the formation of these acids in the interstellar environment. We show that ionized glycine and β-alanine are produced in the reactions of hydroxylamine ions, NH2OH+, with acetic and propanoic acid respectively. Even more promising in the context of interstellar synthesis are our results that demonstrate the corresponding production of the protonated amino acids from analogous reactions with protonated hydroxylamine. The striking specificity of these syntheses for the β-isomer of alanine suggests that the amino acids of CI (Carbonaceous Ivona) chondrite meteorites are products of interstellar chemistry and supports the hypothesis that these meteorites are of cometary origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations139
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207