MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078685372 · doi:10.1142/9789812702456_0035

DISCOVERING SEQUENCE-STRUCTURE MOTIFS FROM PROTEIN SEGMENTS AND TWO APPLICATIONS

2004· article· en· W2078685372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceSequence (biology)Protein secondary structureCluster (spacecraft)Protein structure predictionStructural alignmentLocal structureProtein tertiary structureSupport vector machineProtein structureArtificial intelligenceDynamic programmingData structureData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Sequence alignmentAlgorithmPeptide sequenceBiologyPhysicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel method for clustering short protein segments having strong sequence-structure correlations, and demonstrate that these clusters contain useful structural information via two applications. When applied to local tertiary structure prediction, we achieve approximately 60% accuracy with a novel dynamic programming algorithm. When applied to secondary structure prediction based on Support Vector Machines, we obtain a approximately 2% gain in Q3 performance by incorporating cluster-derived data into training and classification. These encouraging results illustrate the great potential of using conserved local motifs to tackle protein structure predictions and possibly other important problems in biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207