MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Methodologic Issues Associated With Secretion Weight as a Dependent Variable in Research Using Closed-System Suction Catheters

2000· article· en· W2078695893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
FundersNational Institute of Nursing Research
KeywordsSuctionCatheterMedicineCritically illAirwayAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Closed-system suction catheters (CSSC) were designed to eliminate the need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator during endotracheal suctioning (ETS). During data collection on an NIH-funded study, it was noted that moisture accumulated on the inside of the CSSC and sleeve when attached to the patient for 30 minutes. Because CSSC are not disconnected, they present unique methodologic problems related to measurement of secretions as a dependent variable in clinical research. OBJECTIVES: To describe a valid, reliable, and practical method for weighing secretions obtained during ETS using a CSSC; and to determine the change in weight of a CSSC after its attachment for 30 minutes to a mechanically ventilated patient. METHODS: After being weighed, a CSSC and sputum trap were attached to the endotracheal tube of a mechanically ventilated adult and remained attached for 43 minutes (30 minutes to allow positive end expiratory pressure and oxygenation levels to return to normal and 13 minutes to mimic the time frame for the ETS procedure used in another study). No ETS occurred. The CSSC and sputum trap were then removed and reweighed. RESULTS: A convenience sample consisted of 50 adults who were critically ill and mechanically ventilated. Independent variables included tidal volume, pressure support, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The dependent variable was wet weight of the CSSC, determined by subtracting the preprotocol catheter weight from the postprotocol catheter weight. The mean wet weight for all catheters was 0.5142 +/- 0.1215 grams. In a subset of 37 patients, two wet weights (74 paired observations) were determined. The mean wet weight for these catheters was 0.54014 +/- 0.1404 grams. The paired wet weights were statistically different (t = 2.433; df = 36; p = 0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients and beta coefficients were computed. While tidal volume and pressure support were highly correlated (r = 0.678; p = 0.011), there were no other statistically significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of secretions is a common dependent variable in ETS research. During the time that CSSC are attached to the patient and ventilator, moisture from either the ventilator's humidification system or the patient accumulates in the CSSC. This wet weight is not actually part of the secretions retrieved during ETS and should not be considered in the actual weight of secretions. Further study on the determinants of wet weight is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.325
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it