MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Methodologic Issues Associated With Secretion Weight as a Dependent Variable in Research Using Closed-System Suction Catheters

2000· article· en· W2078695893 on OpenAlexaff
Jill D Steuer, Kathleen Stone, Jennie T. Nickel, Yael Steinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
FundersNational Institute of Nursing Research
KeywordsSuctionCatheterMedicineCritically illAirwayAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Closed-system suction catheters (CSSC) were designed to eliminate the need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator during endotracheal suctioning (ETS). During data collection on an NIH-funded study, it was noted that moisture accumulated on the inside of the CSSC and sleeve when attached to the patient for 30 minutes. Because CSSC are not disconnected, they present unique methodologic problems related to measurement of secretions as a dependent variable in clinical research. OBJECTIVES: To describe a valid, reliable, and practical method for weighing secretions obtained during ETS using a CSSC; and to determine the change in weight of a CSSC after its attachment for 30 minutes to a mechanically ventilated patient. METHODS: After being weighed, a CSSC and sputum trap were attached to the endotracheal tube of a mechanically ventilated adult and remained attached for 43 minutes (30 minutes to allow positive end expiratory pressure and oxygenation levels to return to normal and 13 minutes to mimic the time frame for the ETS procedure used in another study). No ETS occurred. The CSSC and sputum trap were then removed and reweighed. RESULTS: A convenience sample consisted of 50 adults who were critically ill and mechanically ventilated. Independent variables included tidal volume, pressure support, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The dependent variable was wet weight of the CSSC, determined by subtracting the preprotocol catheter weight from the postprotocol catheter weight. The mean wet weight for all catheters was 0.5142 +/- 0.1215 grams. In a subset of 37 patients, two wet weights (74 paired observations) were determined. The mean wet weight for these catheters was 0.54014 +/- 0.1404 grams. The paired wet weights were statistically different (t = 2.433; df = 36; p = 0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients and beta coefficients were computed. While tidal volume and pressure support were highly correlated (r = 0.678; p = 0.011), there were no other statistically significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of secretions is a common dependent variable in ETS research. During the time that CSSC are attached to the patient and ventilator, moisture from either the ventilator's humidification system or the patient accumulates in the CSSC. This wet weight is not actually part of the secretions retrieved during ETS and should not be considered in the actual weight of secretions. Further study on the determinants of wet weight is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.529
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.657
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5290.657
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.325
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing ResearchSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207