The Luxembourg Common Agricultural Policy Reform and the European Food Industries: What's at Stake?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On June 26, 2003, the European Union (EU) adopted a new reform of its Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Its boldest measure is the creation of a Single Farm Payment that will replace most of the present direct payments. We address quantitatively three issues raised by this new reform, using a computable general equilibrium model that allows us to measure the impacts on the food industries as well as their role in the transmission of impacts along the food chain. The first issue examined is whether this reform helps the EU15 to remove the controversial export subsidies. Our numerical results show that this reform effectively reduces the amount of export subsidies but without removing them. Our second concern lies with the production and trade distortion impacts of CAP direct payments. We investigate this issue in the case of full decoupling, as well as partial decoupling as chosen by EU15 Member States. We find that they have rather similar effects on production and trade. Finally, we explore the employment effects, and findings indicate that this reform leads to a significant decline of farm labor and, by contrast, to a very modest impact on the employment level by food processors. Generally, food industries are only marginally affected by this CAP reform. L'Union européenne (UE) a adopté une nouvelle réforme de sa Politique agricole commune (PAC) en juin 2003. La mesure la plus audacieuse a été la création d'un paiement unique par exploitation pour remplacer la plupart des aides directes actuelles. Dans le présent article, nous avons examiné trois questions soulevées par cette réforme à l'aide d'un modèle d'équilibre général calculable qui nous a permis de mesurer les répercussions sur les industries alimentaires de même que le rôle de ces industries dans la transmission des répercussions dans la chaîne alimentaire. La première question visait à déterminer si cette réforme permettait à l'UE‐15 d'éliminer les subventions à l'exportation controversées. Nos résultats numériques ont montré que la réforme diminuait effectivement ces subventions sans toutefois les éliminer. La deuxième question portait sur les répercussions des paiements uniques de la PAC sur la production et la distorsion des échanges. Nous avons examiné cette question en utilisant le découplage total et le découplage partiel retenu par les États membres de l'UE. Nous avons trouvé que les effets sur la production et les échanges étaient plutôt similaires entre les deux options de découplage. Enfin, nous avons évalué les répercussions sur l'emploi et nos résultats ont indiqué que cette réforme entraînait une baisse significative de la main‐d'œuvre agricole contrairement à de très faibles répercussions pour les entreprises de transformation des aliments. En général, les industries agroalimentaires ne sont que légèrement touchées par cette réforme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".