MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078819097 · doi:10.1109/aim.2014.6878334

Introduction of a LIDAR-based obstacle detection system on the LineScout power line robot

2014· article· en· W2078819097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
FundersHydro-Québec
KeywordsObstacleLidarRobotLine (geometry)Power (physics)Computer scienceSpan (engineering)SIGNAL (programming language)Range (aeronautics)Remote sensingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysicsGeologyGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a sequel of an earlier paper that featured a thorough characterization of the Hokuyo UTM-30LX laser range finder, which showed promise for a specific application: allowing a power line robot to detect obstacles in its path. After a quick summary of the earlier conclusions, this paper pushes the validation farther by assessing for the first time this popular LIDAR's performance when subjected to the particularly challenging, outdoor, power line environmental conditions: large temperature range, changes in lighting, strong magnetic fields, and oscillating or vibrating targets. Use of return signal intensity, predictably affected by the angle of incidence on the target and by target surface finish, is also investigated as a means to detect variations due to an obstacle. Scanning results with LineScout traveling at maximum speed on a full-scale power line span are then analyzed to validate the proposed detection thresholds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207