MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078880457 · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.061802

Sensitivity of spatial photoelectron distributions to the absolute phase of an ultrashort intense laser pulse

2002· article· en· W2078880457 on OpenAlexaff
Szczepan Chelkowski, André D. Bandrauk

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAsymmetryAtomic physicsIonizationLaserPolarization (electrochemistry)ElectronPulse (music)Phase (matter)Linear polarizationOpticsIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using numerical solutions of the three-dimensional time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation (TDSE) for the hydrogen atom in an intense, ultrashort, i.e., few-cycle, linearly polarized laser pulse, we demonstrate that ionization yields measured in the forward direction $(0<\ensuremath{\theta}<15\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})$ depend strongly (by a factor of 2) on the carrier phase, leading to considerable directional (forward or backward) photoelectron asymmetries along the laser polarization vector. This effect vanishes for pulses comprising more than 15 cycles. The phase dependence of photoelectron asymmetry is intensity-dependent: the strongest asymmetry is found in the intermediate multiphoton-tunneling regime, where asymmetry originates from the Coulomb attraction after tunneling. The character of asymmetry drastically changes when an electron ionizes in the barrier-suppression regime. A measurement method of the absolute phase and width, based on this directional effect, is proposed for linearly polarized ultrashort laser pulses pulses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207