Two-Layer Energy-Management Architecture for a Fuel Cell HEV Using Road Trip Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the design of a two-layer energy-management system for a fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). The first layer (upper layer) deals with the vehicle energy consumption, whereas the second layer (lower layer) deals with the power splitting between the fuel cell and the battery. The upper layer aims at providing the globally optimal energy consumption profile by considering the road-trip information and the vehicle dynamics. This energy profile is independent of the number and type of power sources on the vehicle. Therefore, it can be used to assist the real-time power splitting algorithm implemented into the lower layer. This layer design goal is mainly to share the vehicle power demand between the fuel cell and the battery while minimizing the hydrogen consumption. In addition, the splitting method takes into account the fuel cell efficiency map and the hydrogen/electricity relative pricing while imposing a smooth behavior on the fuel cell. This smooth behavior is desirable to preserve the fuel cell life and reduce the oxygen starvation phenomenon. The proposed energy-management system has been successfully implemented and validated on an HEV test bench. The experiments and simulations using several standard driving cycles suggest that the approach can reduce the hydrogen consumption up to 10% compared to a rule-based method and a depleting-sustaining method while preserving at the same time the battery pack from overdischarging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".