MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079066676 · doi:10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.95

Reduced symmetry elements in linear elasticity

2008· article· en· W2079066676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications on Pure &amp Applied Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationSymmetry (geometry)MathematicsSimple (philosophy)Angular momentumInterpolation (computer graphics)Elasticity (physics)Element (criminal law)Mathematical analysisTheoretical physicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In continuum mechanics problems, we have to work in most cases with symmetric tensors,symmetry expressing the conservation of angular momentum. Discretization of symmetrictensors is however difficult and a classical solution is to employ some form of reduced symmetry.We present two ways of introducing elements with reduced symmetry.The first one is based on Stokes problems, and in the two-dimensional case allows torecover practically all interesting elements on the market. This however is(definitely) not true in three dimensions. On the other hand the second approach (based on a verynice property of several interpolation operators) works for three-dimensional problems as well,and allows, in particular, to prove the convergence of theArnold-Falk-Winther element with simple and standard arguments, without the use of theBerstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it