MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W207915183 · doi:10.13182/nt08-a4027

Advanced Polymer Composites for the Fabrication of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Containers

2008· article· en· W207915183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeekMaterials scienceSpent nuclear fuelComposite materialFlexural strengthComposite numberGraphiteDifferential scanning calorimetryUltimate tensile strengthNuclear fuelPolymerWaste managementNuclear chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, the spent nuclear fuel disposal method proposed is to permanently isolate the spent fuel in deep underground vaults carved in stable granite rock formations within the Canadian Shield, with the integrity of the isolation to be assured for a minimum period of 500 yr. The present work aims at determining the feasibility of using a consolidated composite material made of an advanced polymer called PEEK (Poly Ether Ether Ketone) and continuous graphite fiber to fabricate a container designed to isolate the spent nuclear fuel from the biosphere for such very long time periods. The research focused on submitting the PEEK-based composite material to a thermal and radioactive environment comparable to, and, in some aspects, more aggressive than, the conditions of exposure in the disposal vault. The changes to the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of the material following prolonged exposure were then determined. The simulation of the environment was achieved by irradiating numerous test specimens in a mixed radiation field produced by a SLOWPOKE-2 nuclear research reactor at controlled ambient temperatures ranging from ˜20 to 75°C. The specimens were characterized via several methods: tensile and flexural testing, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and wide-angle X-ray scattering. The results confirmed that the PEEK-based composite material was resistant to exposure to high radiation doses (1 MGy), at temperatures between ˜20 and 75°C. The mechanical and other properties were barely affected, with values rarely exceeding 1σ of the properties of nonirradiated samples, suggesting that the PEEK–graphite fiber composite material can indeed be considered as a very good candidate for this demanding application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it