MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079174575 · doi:10.1002/pi.1594

Synthesis and ring‐opening polymerization of macrocyclic aromatic sulfide oligomers

2004· article· en· W2079174575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer International · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArylenePolymer chemistrySulfidePolymerizationChemistryRing-opening polymerizationPolymerMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A series of macrocyclic(arylene sulfide) oligomers were synthesized by reaction of 4,4′‐oxybis(benzenethiol) with a number of difluoro compounds in dimethylformamide (DMF) in the presence of anhydrous K 2 CO 3 under high dilution conditions. The difluoro compound can be 4,4′‐difluorobenzophenone, bis(4‐fluorophenyl)sulfone or 1,3‐bis(4‐fluorobenzoyl)benzene. Detailed structural characterization of these oligomers by matrix‐assisted laser desorption and ionization‐time of flight‐mass spectroscopy (MALDI‐TOF‐MS) demonstrated their cyclic nature. The MALDI‐TOF‐MS technique has proved to be a powerful tool to analyze these cyclics. These cyclic oligomers are amorphous and highly soluble in DMF and N , N ′‐dimethyl acetamide. Moreover, these cyclic(arylene sulfide) oligomers readily underwent ring‐opening polymerization in the melt at 285 °C in the presence of 2,2′‐dibenzothiazole disulfide, affording linear, high molecular weigh poly(aromatic sulfide)s. These polymers are insoluble in most common solvents. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it