Synthesis and ring‐opening polymerization of macrocyclic aromatic sulfide oligomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of macrocyclic(arylene sulfide) oligomers were synthesized by reaction of 4,4′‐oxybis(benzenethiol) with a number of difluoro compounds in dimethylformamide (DMF) in the presence of anhydrous K2CO3 under high dilution conditions. The difluoro compound can be 4,4′‐difluorobenzophenone, bis(4‐fluorophenyl)sulfone or 1,3‐bis(4‐fluorobenzoyl)benzene. Detailed structural characterization of these oligomers by matrix‐assisted laser desorption and ionization‐time of flight‐mass spectroscopy (MALDI‐TOF‐MS) demonstrated their cyclic nature. The MALDI‐TOF‐MS technique has proved to be a powerful tool to analyze these cyclics. These cyclic oligomers are amorphous and highly soluble in DMF and N,N′‐dimethyl acetamide. Moreover, these cyclic(arylene sulfide) oligomers readily underwent ring‐opening polymerization in the melt at 285 °C in the presence of 2,2′‐dibenzothiazole disulfide, affording linear, high molecular weigh poly(aromatic sulfide)s. These polymers are insoluble in most common solvents. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".