MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079444671 · doi:10.2118/165524-ms

An Experimental Study of the Post-CHOPS Cyclic Solvent Injection Process

2013· article· en· W2079444671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersPetroleum Technology Research Centre
KeywordsWormholeSolventPetroleum engineeringMaterials sciencePorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil productionScalingViscosityPerpendicularMechanicsChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryGeologyPhysicsGeometryMembraneOrganic chemistryMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) has been applied successfully in many oil fields in Canada. However, only 5% - 15% of the original oil in place (OOIP) is recovered during cold production typically. Therefore, effective follow-up techniques are of great importance. Cyclic solvent injection (CSI), as a post-CHOPS process, has greater potential than continuous solvent injection to enhance heavy oil recovery. Continuous solvent injection results in early breakthrough due to the existence of wormholes; while in CSI process, the existence of wormholes can increase the contact area of solvent and heavy oil and the wormholes also provide channels that allow diluted oil to flow back to the wellbore. In this study, the effects of wormhole and sandpack model properties on the performance of the CSI process are experimentally investigated using three different cylindrical sandpack models. The length and diameter of the base model are 30.48 cm and 3.81 cm, respectively. The other two models, one with a larger length (i.e. 60.96 cm) and the other with a larger diameter (i.e. 15.24 cm), are used for up-scaling study in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the wormhole, respectively. The porosity and permeability of these models are about 35% and 5.5 Darcy typically. A typical western Canadian oil sample with a viscosity of 4330 mPa · s at 15 °C is used. And pure propane is selected as the solvent. The experimental results suggest that (1) the existence of wormhole can significantly increase the oil production rate. The larger the wormhole coverage is, the better the CSI performance is; (2) a reservoir or well with wormholes developed at bottom is more favorable for Post-CHOPS CSI process; (3) the oil recovery factor is almost independent on the model diameter during the chamber rising phase; and the oil relative production rates in two different diameter models are close during the chamber spreading phase due to similar solvent dispersion rate; (4) the model length hardly affected the oil production rate comparing with the wormhole length; (5) the well with a horizontal wormhole is inclined to get a good CSI performance; (6) a relationship of oil production rate to drainage height is obtained and verified; (7) the mass transfer rate decreases verse time during the soaking period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it