Single‐image super‐resolution in RGB space via group sparse representation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Super‐resolution (SR) is the problem of generating a high‐resolution (HR) image from one or more low‐resolution (LR) images. This study presents a new approach to single‐image super‐resolution based on group sparse representation. Two dictionaries are constructed corresponding to the LR and HR image patches, respectively. The sparse coefficients of an input LR image patch in terms of the LR dictionary are used to recover the HR patch from the HR dictionary. When constructing the dictionaries, the three colour channels in a training image patch are considered a group composed of three atoms. The whole group is selected simultaneously when representing an image patch so that the correlations between the colour channels can be retained. A dictionary training method is also designed in which the two dictionaries are trained jointly to ensure that the corresponding LR and HR patches have the same sparse coefficients. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and its robustness to noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it