MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079786247 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2006.365402

Higher-order Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

2006· article· en· W2079786247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy cognitive mapAdaptabilitySimplicityComputer scienceTransparency (behavior)Fuzzy logicDomain (mathematical analysis)Extension (predicate logic)Order (exchange)Artificial intelligenceFuzzy control systemNeuro-fuzzyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FCMs are aimed at modeling and simulation of dynamic systems. They exhibit numerous advantages, such as model transparency, simplicity, and adaptability to a given domain, to name a few. FCMs have been applied to numerous industrial and research areas. In some cases generic FCMs suffer from a certain drawback that originates from their definition and concerns a limited, first-order dynamics of processing realized at the nodes of the maps. In this study, we introduce a concept of higher-order memory based FCMs. The proposed extension modifies the simulation model of a generic FCM while it does not negatively impact transparency and simplicity of the model itself. We discuss several architectural alternatives along with the ensuing computing and optimization aspects. Preliminary experimental results included in this paper show superiority of the extended higher-order memory based FCMs over a generic FCM in terms of the modeling accuracy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207