MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079890614 · doi:10.1145/1577222.1577277

Group key management in wireless mesh networks

2007· article· en· W2079890614 on OpenAlexaff
Celia Li, Uyen Trang Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless mesh networkComputer networkComputer scienceKey managementKey (lock)Group keyMulticastScalabilityDistributed computingSecure multicastRekeyingProtocol (science)Wireless networkRouting protocolWirelessComputer securityRouting (electronic design automation)TelecommunicationsProtocol Independent MulticastReliable multicastEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Group key management (GKM) refers to the actions taken to up-date and distribute the group key upon members joining and leaving a multicast group. Although there exist several GKM schemes, they are not readily applicable to wireless mesh networks (WMNs) due to many differences between WMNs and wireline networks. We present a review of existing GKM protocols and identify their applicability to WMNs. Based on the review, we propose a framework for scalable and efficient GKM in WMNs, and a GKM protocol named CCoKA (Centralized COntributory Key Agreement) for use in a WMN. CCoKA is based on the scalable and efficient key tree approach and the well-known Diffie-Hellman cryptographic protocol. The proposed framework and CCoKA protocol take into account the characteristics of mesh network operations, wireless routers and mobile devices. We also suggest directions for future research on GKM in WMNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207