MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080329798 · doi:10.1063/1.4818797

Some classes of renormalizable tensor models

2013· article· en· W2080329798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTensor (intrinsic definition)Rank (graph theory)PhysicsMathematical physicsFunction (biology)Tensor fieldTensor densitySimple (philosophy)Theoretical physicsMathematicsPure mathematicsExact solutions in general relativityCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We identify new families of renormalizable tensor models from anterior renormalizable tensor models via a mapping capable of reducing or increasing the rank of the theory without having an effect on the renormalizability property. Mainly, a version of the rank 3 tensor model as defined by Ben Geloun and Samary [Ann. Henri Poincare 14, 1599 (2013); e-print arXiv:1201.0176 [hep-th]]10.1007/s00023-012-0225-5 and the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model in 4D and 2D generate three different classes of renormalizable models. The proof of the renormalizability is fully performed for the first reduced model. The same procedure can be applied for the remaining cases. Interestingly, we find that, due to the peculiar behavior of anisotropic wave function renormalizations, the rank 3 tensor model reduced to a matrix model generates a simple super-renormalizable vector model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it