Stabilization of Periodic Orbits for Planar Walking With Noninstantaneous Double-Support Phase
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an analytical approach to design a continuous time-invariant two-level control scheme for asymptotic stabilization of a desired period-one trajectory for a hybrid model describing walking by a planar biped robot with noninstantaneous double-support phase and point feet. It is assumed that the hybrid model consists of both single- and double-support phases. The design method is based on the concept of hybrid zero dynamics. At the first level, parameterized continuous within-stride controllers, including single- and double-support-phase controllers, are employed. These controllers create a family of 2-D finite-time attractive and invariant submanifolds on which the dynamics of the mechanical system is restricted. Moreover, since the mechanical system during the double-support phase is overactuated, the feedback law during this phase is designed to be minimum norm on the desired periodic orbit. At the second level, parameters of the within-stride controllers are updated by an event-based update law to achieve hybrid invariance, which results in a reduced-order hybrid model for walking. By these means, stability properties of the periodic orbit can be analyzed and modified by a restricted Poincaré return map. Finally, a numerical example for the proposed control scheme is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it