Empathie, biais de mentalisation, comportements pro-sociaux et troubles de comportement chez les enfants d’âge scolaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente étude propose d’examiner les liens entre la capacité d’empathie, les comportements pro-sociaux, les biais de mentalisation et les troubles de comportement (TC) chez les garçons âgés de 7 à 12 ans. Pour ce faire, 51 garçons présentant divers niveaux de TC et leurs parents ont participé à la recherche. Les enfants ont rempli des questionnaires autoadministrés concernant l’empathie et les biais de mentalisation. Pour leur part, les parents ont rempli des questionnaires relatifs à l’empathie, aux comportements pro-sociaux et aux TC manifestés par leurs enfants. Les résultats démontrent que les biais de mentalisation négatifs et les comportements pro-sociaux prédisent 24,5 % de la variance des TC. La capacité d’empathie quant à elle serait une variable médiatrice entre les comportements pro-sociaux et la présence des TC. Les résultats de la recherche permettront d’ajuster les programmes de prévention des TC et les interventions offertes aux enfants d’âge scolaire présentant ces troubles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".