MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Finding (Short) Paths in Social Networks

2006· article· en· W2080617644 on OpenAlexaff
André Allavena, Anirban Dasgupta, John E. Hopcroft, Ravi Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Mathematics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegree (music)MathematicsSet (abstract data type)Degree distributionTheoretical computer scienceRandom graphSocial network (sociolinguistics)Computer scienceComplex networkCombinatoricsGraphSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While several analytic models aim to explain the existence of short paths in social networks such as the web, relatively few address the problem of efficiently finding them, especially in a decentralized manner. Since developing purely decentralized search algorithms in general social-network models appears hard, we relax the notion of decentralized search by allowing the option of storing a _small_ amount of preprocessed information about the network. We show that one can identify a small set of vertices in an undirected social network so that connectivity information of the vertices in this set can be used in conjunction with the local connectivity properties to perform decentralized search and find short paths between vertices. Our results are for random graphs with power law degree distribution generated by a variant of the expected degree model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet MathematicsSame topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207