Women's Lived Experiences With Pregnancy and Midwifery in a Medicalized and Fetocentric Context
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasingly, women are subjected to examination throughout pregnancy and childbirth. Historically, pregnancy and childbirth were considered a natural, normal, woman-centered event. Presently, they are conceptualized as a dangerous time when a woman's health and that of her baby are at risk, thus requiring constant medical monitoring and intervention, often under the control of male physicians. As a consequence, women negotiate their experiences with pregnancy in a medicalized and fetocentric ideological context. The collection of stories in this article reveals the social and cultural contexts of women's lived experiences with pregnancy through a feminist lens. Short stories are used to give voice to women's experiences and to assert that women are the experts of their own health and well-being. Moreover, the use of narratives contributes to the dialogue of creative analytic practice and representation fostered by qualitative inquiry and feminist epistemologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it