MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081506163 · doi:10.1017/s0022112005006567

Experimental study of a turbulent buoyant helium plume

2005· article· en· W2081506163 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulencePhysicsParticle image velocimetryReynolds numberMechanicsPlumePlanar laser-induced fluorescenceVortexOpticsThermodynamicsLaser-induced fluorescenceLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental study has been performed on the dynamics of a large turbulent buoyanthelium plume. Two-dimensional velocity fields were measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV) while helium mass fraction was determined by planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF). PIV and PLIF were performed simultaneously in order to obtain velocity and mass fraction data over a plane that encompassed the plume core, the near-field mixing zones and the surrounding air. The Rayleigh–Taylor instability at the base of the plume leads to the vortex that grows to dominate the flow. This process repeats in a cyclical manner. The temporally and spatially resolved data show a strong negative correlation between density and vertical velocity, as well as a strong 90° phase lag between peaks in the vertical and horizontal velocities throughout the flow field owing to large coherent structures associated with puffing of the turbulent plume. The joint velocity an mass fraction data are used to calculate Favre-averaged statistics in addition to Reynolds-(time) averaged statistics. Unexpectedly, the difference between both the Favre-averaged and Reynolds-averaged velocities and second-order turbulent statistics is less than the uncertainty in the data throughout the flow field. A simple analysis was performed to determine the expected differences between Favre and Reynolds statistics for flows with periodic fluctuations in which the density and velocity fields are perfectly correlated, but have the phase relations as suggested by the data. The analytical results agreewith the data, showing that the Favre and Reynolds statistics will be the same to lead order. The combination of observation and simple analysis suggests that for buoyancy-dominated flows in which it can be expected that density and velocity are strongly correlated,phase relations will result in only second-order differences between Favre- and Reynolds-averaged data in spite of strong fluctuations in both density and velocity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it