Cross-Domain Object Recognition Via Input-Output Kernel Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is of great importance to investigate the domain adaptation problem of image object recognition, because now image data is available from a variety of source domains. To understand the changes in data distributions across domains, we study both the input and output kernel spaces for cross-domain learning situations, where most labeled training images are from a source domain and testing images are from a different target domain. To address the feature distribution change issue in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space induced by vector-valued functions, we propose a domain adaptive input-output kernel learning (DA-IOKL) algorithm, which simultaneously learns both the input and output kernels with a discriminative vector-valued decision function by reducing the data mismatch and minimizing the structural error. We also extend the proposed method to the cases of having multiple source domains. We examine two cross-domain object recognition benchmark data sets, and the proposed method consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art domain adaptation and multiple kernel learning methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it