MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082077542 · doi:10.1080/01140670909510263

Dynamics and phases of kiwifruit ( <i>Actinidia deliciosa</i> ) growth curves

2009· article· en· W2082077542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMassey University
KeywordsActinidia deliciosaActinidiaActinidia chinensisBotanyBiologyHorticultureEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We construct a parametric “growth curve”, the average fruit weight versus days since mid bloom, for kiwifruit ( Actinidia deliciosa ). The growth curve takes the form of a double sigmoid multiplied by a “shrinkage curve” (to represent late shrinkage of fruit on the vine before harvest) and the parameters have been fitted satisfactorily to data from four growing seasons, three sites and two treatments. The structure of the curve allows for the estimation of a “change point” at which the acceleration of the fruit weight is minimised. The fruit size at harvest is then shown to be partially determined by the timing of the change point and the fruit weight at that time. The timing of the change point is dependent on the average temperature during the period of rapid initial growth. These results have a potential application in the prediction of mean harvest fruit weight, using information available at an earlier time in the growing season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it