Globally optimal spinal cord segmentation using a minimal path in high dimensions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spinal cord segmentation is an important step to empirically quantify spinal cord atrophy that can occur in neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). In this work, we propose a novel method to find the globally optimal segmentation of the spinal cord using a high dimensional minimal path search. The spinal cord cross-sectional shapes are represented using principal component analysis (in the probability simplex) which captures most of spinal cord's axial cross-sectional variation and partial volume effects. We propose modifications to the A* minimal path search algorithm that drastically reduce the required memory and run-time to make our high dimensional minimal path optimization computationally feasible. Finally, we validate our results over five vertebrae levels of both healthy and MS clinical MR volumes (20 volumes total) and show improvements on volume agreement with expert segmentations and less user interaction when compared to current state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it