MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082882323 · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.538973

Host country national's reactions to expatriate pay policies: making a case for a cultural alignment pay model

2011· article· en· W2082882323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Human Resource Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpatriateMultinational corporationEthnocentrismPerceptionHostilitySchismBusinessSociologyPolitical economyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyPsychologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limited evidence exists that explores the reactions of host country nationals (HCNs) to ethnocentric pay policies of multinational enterprises (MNEs). However, HCNs are important both for facilitating expatriate adjustment and also for increasing MNE's effectiveness in the host nation. Using a social identity theory perspective, I argue that ascriptive identities formed on the basis of cultural values are deeply entrenched on the cognitive make-up of HCNs. MNEs that downplay national cultural beliefs may heighten hostility between HCNs and expatriates. I propose a cultural alignment model as a significant step toward integrating HCN's perceptions and a way to reduce social schism between expatriates and HCNs. Several positive outcomes resulting from cultural alignment are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it