MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083025809 · doi:10.1109/ssp.2009.5278556

Bayesian spectral amplitude estimation for speech enhancement with correlated spectral components

2009· article· en· W2083025809 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPESQEstimatorSpeech enhancementBayesian probabilityUncorrelatedAmplitudeComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsAlgorithmUpper and lower boundsBayes estimatorSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsNoise reductionPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Bayesian short-time spectral amplitude (STSA) estimation for single channel speech enhancement, the spectral components are traditionally assumed to be uncorrelated. However, this assumption is not exact since some correlation is present in practice. In this paper, we propose a STSA estimator with correlated frequency components. Since its closed-form solution is not readily available, we alternatively derive closed-form expressions for corresponding upper and lower bounds. Three new speech enhancement estimators are proposed based on those bounds: one for each bound and one that is a combination of both. Results of PESQ and informal listening experiments indicate that the proposed estimators give better performances than earlier estimators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it