MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083025809 · doi:10.1109/ssp.2009.5278556

Bayesian spectral amplitude estimation for speech enhancement with correlated spectral components

2009· article· en· W2083025809 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Plourde, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPESQEstimatorSpeech enhancementBayesian probabilityUncorrelatedAmplitudeComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsAlgorithmUpper and lower boundsBayes estimatorSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsNoise reductionPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Bayesian short-time spectral amplitude (STSA) estimation for single channel speech enhancement, the spectral components are traditionally assumed to be uncorrelated. However, this assumption is not exact since some correlation is present in practice. In this paper, we propose a STSA estimator with correlated frequency components. Since its closed-form solution is not readily available, we alternatively derive closed-form expressions for corresponding upper and lower bounds. Three new speech enhancement estimators are proposed based on those bounds: one for each bound and one that is a combination of both. Results of PESQ and informal listening experiments indicate that the proposed estimators give better performances than earlier estimators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal ProcessingSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207