An Intensive Study of the Size and Composition of Submicron Atmospheric Aerosols at a Rural Site in Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atmospheric sampling was conducted at a rural site near Egbert, about 70 km north of Toronto, Ontario, Canada from March 27 to May 8, 2003 to characterize the physical and chemical properties of the ambient aerosol in near real-time. The instrumentation included a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), an ultrafine condensation particle counter (UCPC), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS), and a particulate nitrate monitor (R&P 8400N) for aerosol measurements. Gas-phase non-methane hydrocarbon compounds (NMHCs) were measured by gas chromatograph-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Filter samples were also collected for analysis of inorganic ions by ion chromatography (IC). Aerosol properties varied considerably depending upon meteorological conditions and airmass histories. For example, urban and industrial emissions advected from the south strongly influenced the site occasionally, resulting in higher particulate mass with the higher fractions of nitrate and organics. Cleaner northwesterly winds carried aerosols with relatively higher fractions of organics and sulfate. The AMS derived mass size distributions showed that the inorganic species in the particles with vacuum aerodynamic diameters between about 60 nm and 600 nm had mass modal vacuum aerodynamic diameters around 400–500 nm. The particulate organics often exhibited two modes at about 100 nm and 425 nm, more noticeable during fresh pollution events. The small organic mode was well correlated with gas-phase nonmethane hydrocarbons such as ethylbenzene, toluene, and propene, suggesting that the likely sources of small organic particles were combustion related emissions. The particulate nitrate exhibited a diurnal variation with higher concentrations during dark hours and minima in the afternoon. Particulate sulfate and organics showed evidence of photochemical processing with higher levels of sulfate and oxygenated organics in the afternoon. Reasonable agreement among all of the co-located measurements is found, provided the upper size limit of the AMS is considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".