MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083408718 · doi:10.1021/ja0676758

Direct <i>N</i>-Cyclopropylation of Cyclic Amides and Azoles Employing a Cyclopropylbismuth Reagent

2006· article· en· W2083408718 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Gagnon, Miguel St‐Onge, Kelly Little, Martin Duplessis, Francis Barabé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsChemistryReagentAmideDichloromethanePyridineNitrogen atomCombinatorial chemistryPyridazineOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclopropanes are commonly found in medicinal chemistry since they provide unique spatial and electronic features, combined with high metabolic stability in liver microsomes. Although many methods are found in the chemist's arsenal to connect a cyclopropyl group to a carbon atom, none exist that perform the direct transfer of this useful fragment onto the nitrogen of a heterocycle or an amide. Considering the importance of nitrogenated compounds in the pharmaceutical industry, we sought to develop an expedient method to N -cyclopropylate azoles and amides. We report herein the direct cyclopropyl transfer reaction onto cyclic amides, isatins, oxindoles, imides, and carbamates employing a nonpyrophoric cyclopropylbismuth reagent. The reaction is catalyzed by copper acetate and proceeds smoothly in dichloromethane at 50 °C in the presence of pyridine. The N -cyclopropylation reaction can also be applied to the preparation of N -cyclopropyl indoles, benzimidazoles, pyrroles, and pyrazoles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207