Stereochemical identification of (<i>R</i>)‐ and (<i>S</i>)‐ibuprofen using residual dipolar couplings, NMR, and modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we describe an NMR-based method that utilizes an orientation media composed of the chiral polypeptide liquid crystal poly-gamma-benzyl-L-glutamate (PBLG) dissolved in CDCl(3), to measure the (1)H-(1)H, (1)H-(13)C and (13)C-(13)C residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) of (R) and (S)-ibuprofen. Calculated RDCs, obtained from the lowest energy conformers, are then compared with the experimentally measured RDCs to predict the stereochemistry of each enantiomer. Excellent agreement between calculated and experimental RDCs was found when the lowest energy structure of each enantiomer, obtained in a simulated PBLG/CDCl(3) environment, was used to back-calculate the RDCs. This method is generally useful for small molecular weight molecules that possess either one or two chiral centers, are soluble in low viscosity organic solvents, and will not crystallize (Clegg, Crystal Structure Analysis. Principles and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002) or cannot be derivatized with a Mosher's reagent (Dale and Mosher, J Am Chem Soc 1973;95:512-519).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it