MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083461929 · doi:10.1063/1.2180430

Effects of dc-dielectrophoretic force on particle trajectories in microchannels

2006· article· en· W2083461929 on OpenAlexaff
Kwan Hyoung Kang, Xiangchun Xuan, Yuejun Kang, Dongqing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochannelDielectrophoresisElectric fieldMechanicsParticle (ecology)ElectrophoresisFinite element methodMaterials scienceElectrodeClassical mechanicsMicrofluidicsPhysicsNanotechnologyChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method of controlling the particle trajectory in a microchannel is demonstrated. The method utilizes the dc-dielectrophoretic (dc-DEP) force created around an insulating hurdle in a microchannel under an applied dc electric field. This method does not require a complicated electrode array which is commonly used in the conventional ac-DEP system. The “proof-of-principle” experiments were carried out using a straight microchannel with a rectangle-shaped hurdle in the middle. The experiments showed that the trajectories of the micron-sized particles can be controlled by the DEP force under electric-field strengths of 5–20kV∕m. To compare with the experimental results, the particle motion was simulated using the Lagrangian tracking method, taking into consideration of the electrophoretic force, the dielectrophoretic force, and the dielectric interaction between the particle and the channel wall. The numerical simulation based on the finite-element method showed a reasonable agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207