MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083833937 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2001-026-x

K-Theory of Non-Commutative Spheres Arising from the Fourier Automorphism

2001· article· en· W2083833937 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel G. Walters

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsInjective functionAutomorphismSeparable spaceHomomorphismConjectureGeneralizationPure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)Subspace topologyCommutative propertyCharacter (mathematics)Automorphism groupCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For a dense Gδ set of real parameters θ in [0, 1] (containing the rationals) it is shown that the group K0(Aθ ⋊σ ) is isomorphic to , where Aθ is the rotation C*-algebra generated by unitaries U, V satisfying VU = e2πiθUV and σ is the Fourier automorphism of Aθ defined by σ(U) = V, σ(V) = U−1. More precisely, an explicit basis for K0 consisting of nine canonical modules is given. (A slight generalization of this result is also obtained for certain separable continuous fields of unital C*-algebras over [0, 1].) The Connes Chern character ch: K0(Aθ ⋊σ ) → Hev (Aθ ⋊σ )* is shown to be injective for a dense Gδ set of parameters θ. The main computational tool in this paper is a group homomorphism T: K0(Aθ ⋊σ ) → obtained from the Connes Chern character by restricting the functionals in its codomain to a certain nine-dimensional subspace of Hev (Aθ ⋊σ ). The range of T is fully determined for each θ. (We conjecture that this subspace is all of Hev.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207