MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083979106 · doi:10.1179/174328407x236940

Application of a mathematical model to multipass hot deformation of aluminium alloy AA5083

2008· article· en· W2083979106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsIngotMicrostructureMaterials scienceAluminiumSheet metalDeformation (meteorology)AlloyMetallurgyStored energyWork (physics)ScheduleAluminium alloyComposite materialMechanical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sheet metal forming operations are used extensively in industry to alter the shape of the metal through plastic deformation. A critical step in the sheet manufacturing process is hot rolling which reduces the thickness of the ingot and can significantly impact the final sheet properties based on the microstructure evolution during this operation. A two-dimensional mathematical model was developed and experimentally validated to simulate deformation and microstructure evolution during multipass hot rolling for an AA5083 aluminium alloy. The details of model development and experimental validation can be found in earlier work. In this article, the application of the validated model to further understand and optimise the material stored energy and ensuing microstructure during multipass hot rolling is described. Specifically, the model was employed to examine the effect of changing the number of rolling passes as well as strain partitioning during multipass rolling on the material stored energy and the resulting microstructure. Results indicate that the number of passes has a significant effect on the stored energy which increases as the number of passes increases. In addition within a multipass rolling schedule the way in which the strain is partitioned is also shown to have an effect on the stored energy with a decreasing strain/pass schedule providing the highest material stored energy after rolling is complete. In contrast an increasing strain/pass schedule provides the lowest stored energy in the material after rolling. This overall effect is attributed to the differences in strip temperature as the lowest exit temperature strip has the highest stored energy. The model was further utilised to generate operational curves to predict the material stored energy and subsequent recrystallisation under different rolling conditions, namely at different interpass times and total strains for various start deformation temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it