PRISM: Fine-Grained Resource-Aware Scheduling for MapReduce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MapReduce has become a popular model for data-intensive computation in recent years. By breaking down each job into small map and reduce tasks and executing them in parallel across a large number of machines, MapReduce can significantly reduce the running time of data-intensive jobs. However, despite recent efforts toward designing resource-efficient MapReduce schedulers, existing solutions that focus on scheduling at the task-level still offer sub-optimal job performance. This is because tasks can have highly varying resource requirements during their lifetime, which makes it difficult for task-level schedulers to effectively utilize available resources to reduce job execution time. To address this limitation, we introduce PRISM, a fine-grained resource-aware MapReduce scheduler that divides tasks into phases, where each phase has a constant resource usage profile, and performs scheduling at the phase level. We first demonstrate the importance of phase-level scheduling by showing the resource usage variability within the lifetime of a task using a wide-range of MapReduce jobs. We then present a phase-level scheduling algorithm that improves execution parallelism and resource utilization without introducing stragglers. In a 10-node Hadoop cluster running standard benchmarks, PRISM offers high resource utilization and provides 1.3× improvement in job running time compared to the current Hadoop schedulers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".