MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Promoting Peer Interaction Skills

2007· article· en· W2084323458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Language Disorders · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyLanguage developmentProfessional developmentDevelopmental psychologyPeer groupNaturalistic observationPedagogyMedical educationSocial psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article highlights the importance of peer interactions for pre–school-aged children's social and language development and demonstrates the need for professional development in this area. Learning Language and Loving It™—The Hanen Program® for Early Childhood Educators and Preschool Teachers is a professional development program that is delivered by speech–language pathologists and teaches educators and preschool teachers to use naturalistic environmental arrangements and verbal support strategies to facilitate peer interactions. This article describes the program and summarizes research that indicates that the program effectively improves educators' use of verbal supports for peer interaction. Other outcomes for children in their care included increased interactions with their peers that continued beyond 2 conversational turns. To date, the efficacy of the verbal support strategies used in this in-service program has been investigated only for typically developing children. The program's usefulness in promoting peer interactions with children who have disabilities (e.g., language disorders) is beginning to be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it