MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Handbook of the Sociology of Religion

2005· article· en· W2084383009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sociology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecularizationSociologySociology of religionPluralism (philosophy)Field (mathematics)Social scienceEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dillon, Michele (ed.) Handbook of the Sociology of Religion Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 2003 481 pp. £65.00 (hardback) Students and scholars looking for an overview of the state of the field of the sociology of religion in America today will be well served by Dillon's Handbook, which covers the sub-discipline's main theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues through a collection of balanced, well-written and well-researched chapters by leading scholars of the field in the USA, with token contributions from Israel, Britain, and Canada. Indeed, the book's main weakness is its overly American focus. Part One, ‘Religion as a Field of Sociological Knowledge’, covers the main theoretical issues in the historical development of the sociology of religion as an academic discipline. Especially relevant is Peter Beyer's essay (Ch. 4), which addresses how globalization forces us to reconsider definitions of religion, and proposes a new typology of social forms of religion. Also, Grace Davies’ contribution (Ch. 5) surveys the historical development of the discipline, and offers a useful summary of the debate between the two paradigms of secularization and rational choice theory, arguing that the former is both a product of, and more consistent with to, the European situation, while rational choice theory reflects an American religious landscape which has always been characterized by pluralism and competition between groups. Contributions to Part Two, ‘Religion and Social Change’, include a concise exposition of the religious economy model by Roger Finke and Rodney Stark; an argument by Philip S. Gorski for taking a deeper historical perspective to overcome the limitations of the secularization hypothesis; and a critical review of the literature on forms of American religious organization from 1930 to 2001, by Patricia M. Y. Chang. In the final essay of this section, Wade Clark Roof proposes an analytic scheme for understanding the relationship between ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality’ and its sociological implications. Parts Three to Six provide extensive coverage of ‘Religion and the Life Course’, ‘Religion and Social Identity’, ‘Religion, Political Behavior, and Public Culture’, and ‘Religion and Socioeconomic Inequality’. Most noteworthy in my opinion is a piece by Fred Kniss on ‘Mapping the Moral Order’, which attempts to move beyond bi-polar conceptions of the American cultural and religious scene (religious liberalism vs conservatism, the ‘culture wars’) by proposing a quadrant formed by crossing two axes based on moral authority and moral project, onto which different religious groups and tendencies can be mapped. This model facilitates the comparison of the social and individual orientations of different groups. My main criticism of the book is its almost parochial focus on the USA. While such an editorial choice is defensible in the name of intellectual and empirical coherence, I wonder if a collection of essays almost exclusively dedicated to, say, India, could ever be published under the broad title Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Dillon's book is a classic example of a persistent anomaly in the sociology of religion (with the notable exceptions of Durkheim and Weber, and a few others), as in other branches of the social sciences, where studies of non-Western societies are relegated to the marginal status of Area Studies or anthropology, while the normative ‘disciplinary’ work is done primarily by specialists of a single Western society. Beyond my quibbling over the title, I wonder if it is even possible to focus on a single country in today's world of global religious networks and organizations, in which, since the Bush, Jnr presidency and 9–11, religion has become central to the geopolitical reconfiguration of world order and conflict. The growing influence of religion in many parts of the world, and its increasing importance as a factor in local, national, and international politics, has underlined the potential relevance of the sociology of religion for understanding the changes of contemporary global society. But only by moving beyond a localized focus on the American (or European) case will the sub-discipline be able to respond to this challenge. In that sense, then, Dillon's Handbook is both a distillation of the considerable past achievements of the American sociology of religion, but also a reminder of the work that remains to be done for it to become fully relevant to understanding the globalized society of today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it