MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084538473 · doi:10.1097/hcr.0b013e31819a00d4

Cardiac Rehabilitation After Stroke—Need and Opportunity

2009· article· en· W2084538473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)RehabilitationMedical diagnosisEtiologyPhysical therapyRetrospective cohort studyAnaerobic exerciseEmergency medicineDiseaseInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief PURPOSE In North America, established long-term rehabilitation programs are commonly available for individuals following a cardiac event but are largely unavailable for stroke survivors. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the availability of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for individuals poststroke (survey of all programs in Ontario, Canada) and (2) the effects of CR, comparing individuals with primary and secondary diagnoses of stroke versus those with cardiac diagnoses only (retrospective review of a large outpatient North American program). METHODS An Ontario-wide survey was disseminated to CR programs to determine barriers to enrollment of stroke participants. Additionally, a retrospective analysis of data from 9,173 participants in 1 CR program in Toronto, Ontario, compared 3 subgroups (n = 19 each): (1) primary diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), (2) primary cardiac diagnosis and occurrence of stroke or TIA, and (3) cardiac diagnoses only. RESULTS Twenty-four of 40 (60%) programs surveyed included stroke participants, although the proportion was small (<5% of total enrollment). Barriers to enrollment included issues around primary diagnosis and degree of stroke-related disability. While those with a history of stroke or TIA had a lower baseline peak oxygen uptake, all 3 groups showed comparable postprogram improvements in peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold (time effect, P < .001). There were no group-time interaction effects. CONCLUSIONS Despite the common cardiovascular etiology of stroke and heart disease, individuals with stroke are not routinely included in CR in Ontario. However, individuals with stroke demonstrated similar training-related improvements in exercise capacity compared with nonstroke participants. Persons living with stroke have similarly poor fitness and share the same risk factors as those with cardiac disease. The enrollment of individuals after stroke in cardiac rehabilitation can provide similar improvements in fitness to those seen in cardiac participants, but structured exercise training is vastly underutilized in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it