MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084800773 · doi:10.1002/pc.20088

Shear and extensional properties of short glass fiber reinforced polypropylene

2005· article· en· W2084800773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Composites · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRheometerMaterials scienceExtensional viscosityComposite materialPolypropyleneShear (geology)ViscosityShear rateRheologyShear viscosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Shear and extensional properties of a commercial short glass fiber reinforced polypropylene were carefully investigated using commercial rheometers and a novel on‐line rheometer. This on‐line slit rheometer, installed on an injection molding press, has been designed to measure the steady shear viscosity, the first normal stress difference, and the apparent extensional viscosity of polymer melts and composites for high strain rates up to 10 5 s −1 in shear and 200 s −1 in extension. Our results show that the steady‐state viscosity measurements using the on‐line rheometer are in excellent agreement with those obtained using commercial rheometers. The steady‐state and the complex viscosities of the composites were found to be fairly close to that of the matrix, but the Cox‐Merz rule was not verified for the composites at high rates. The elasticity of the composites was found to be equal to that of the polypropylene matrix. The apparent extensional viscosity was obtained from the pressure drop in the planar converging die of the slit rheometer using the analyses proposed by Cogswell [1] and Binding [2]. The extensional viscosity of the polypropylene was found to be much larger than the shear viscosity at low strain rates with a Trouton ratio of about 40 that decreased rapidly with increasing strain rate down to the value of 4 at 200 s −1 . The extensional viscosity of the composites was also found to be close to that of the matrix, with values 35 and 5% larger for the 30 and 10 wt% reinforced polypropylenes, respectively. These results are compared with the predictions of the Goddard model [3], which are shown to overpredict our experimental results. POLYM. COMPOS. 26:247–264, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it