Epidemiological Trends of Traumatic Optic Nerve Injuries in the Largest Canadian Adult Trauma Center
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been a paucity of information on the epidemiology of traumatic optic neuropathy (TON). This study documents epidemiology of TON over 2 decades in the largest level I adult trauma center in Canada. METHODS: Data on all the trauma patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre from 1986 to 2007 were collected in a prospective database. The aggregate data on optic nerve injuries including demographic data, etiology, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and associated head and facial injuries were recorded. These were analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques to summarize the association of different variables with TON. RESULTS: During the study period, 0.4% of all trauma patients had TON. The respective demographics for TON group were as follows: male, 76%; median for age, 33.5 years; length of hospital stay, 14 days; ISS, 32; and case fatality, 14%. About two thirds of patients with TON had associated significant head injuries. Conversely, 2.3% of patients with head injury had TON. The relative incidence of TON per year has remained variable from 0% to 1.2%. Motorized vehicle accidents remained the main etiology of TON (63%), but fall had the highest relative frequency leading to TON. In univariate analysis, both ISS and significant head injury were associated with TON. In multivariate analysis, TON was associated with only nasoethmoid complex fractures and significant head injury. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide useful information on the frequency and etiologies of TON. It also highlights the importance of studies on better diagnostic tools for TON.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it