MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085024027 · doi:10.1353/lan.2000.0078

ana kâ-pimwêwêhahk okakêskihkêmo-wina: The counselling speeches of Jim Kâ-Nîpitêhtêw Ed., trans., and with aglossary by Freda Ahenakew and H.C. Wolfart (review)

2000· article· en· W2085024027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlossaryPronunciationLinguisticsHistorySociologyPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK NOTICES 483 within the standard varieties ofEnglish. Muthmann's dictionary is based on British standard pronunciation; American pronunciations are given only in parentheses , and not systematically. Especially users more familiar with American English should be aware of this fact and check related subsections when looking for a specific word ending. In cases of variant pronunciations within and across British and American English, such as [i] and [a] in unstressed syllables, the 'more common form' (xvi) is given. Since it was not always clear to me which variant is considered more common (e.g. priv[i]te orpriv[s]tel) this policy can occasionally cause some irritation. I can therefore only recommend to follow M's own advice to always 'take a look at an alternative pronunciation' (xvi). In sum, this well-made dictionary is a wonderful new research tool which provides easy access to morphologically and phonologically relevant data. [Ingo Plag, Universität Hannover.] ana kâ-pimwêwêhahk okakêskihkêmowina : The counselling speeches of Jim Kâ-Nîpitêhtêw. Ed., trans., and with a glossary by Freda Ahenakew and H. C. Wolfart. (Publications of the Algonquian Text Society/Collection de la Société d'édition de textes algonquiens .) Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 1998. Pp. ix, 390. Ahenakew and Wolfart's edition ofspeeches made by kâ-pimwêwêhahk, a monolingual speaker of Plains Cree, is the fifth volume in a series that presents Cree language discourse with accompanying apparatus. These eight speeches, kakêskihkêmowina 'counselling discourses', were recorded between 1987 and 1989 when kâ-pimwêwêhahk, in his early 80s, was a senior member of the Council of Elders at Saskatchewan Indian Cultural College, Saskatoon. A & W call kâ-pimwêwêhahk's discourses 'sermons ' that are examples of instructional, formal public speeches about the sacred rituals (viii). Chs. 1-4 are homiletic in character, says W, each beginning with an apologia in which the speaker claims he speaks not at his own initiative nor on his own authority but at the urging of those who called on him and as instructed by older and wiser ones (141). In Ch. 1 (46-57) kâ-pimwêwêhahk expresses his concern for Cree young people and talks about ways to preserve for them, and through them, Cree worship ways. In Ch. 2 (58-67) he tells what spiritual practices and rituals one should follow and instructs his audience on how it should properly think about itself in relation to the Creator and other living things. In Ch. 3 (68-87) kâ-pimwêwêhahk speaks about the importance of knowing the Cree traditions, of knowing thereby what being Cree means, and of handing down this knowledge to their descendants because 'we will not always be here on earth' (85). In Ch. 4 (88-99) he warns that Cree parents and grandparents are failing to teach their children and grandchildren Cree traditions, rituals, and beliefs; as a result, young people turn to non-Cree influences and are in danger of losing their 'Creeness'. Chs. 5-8, says W, are primarily narrative and documentary , representing the 'cumulative memory of communal experience and the collective knowledge of the proper conduct of ritual' (142). In Ch. 5 (100-105) kâ-pimwêwêhahk instructs the audience on the role of the pipestem as a 'witness' to treaty negotiations between Cree and the 'Queen's representative '. In Ch. 6 (106-19) he narrates the story of the 1876 treaty negotiations, dramatizing the dialogue between white and Cree negotiators and illustrating the role of the pipestem as a sacred object that witnesses and requires one's truthful speech. In Ch. 7 (120-133) kâ-pimwêwêhahk discusses the importance oftobacco, cloth, and sweetgrass offerings, fasting, lodges, dances, pipe-holding and -pointing rituals, the role of the pipe server, and curative herbs and practices. And in Ch. 8 (134-37) he tells a story that humorously dramatizes the absurd actions, in rituals and healing practices, of Cree who are ignorant of the traditions and their meanings. kâ-pimwêwêhahk's speeches are printed in Cree syllabic typography in one section (1-44) and in romanized Cree orthography and English translation...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it