MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085356622 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-10-10268-8

Defining the set of integers in expansions of the real field by a closed discrete set

2010· article· en· W2085356622 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Hieronymi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplicative functionCombinatoricsField (mathematics)MathematicsBETA (programming language)Alpha (finance)Set (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper D subset-of-or-equal-to double-struck upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⊆ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">D\subseteq \mathbb {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be closed and discrete and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f colon upper D Superscript n Baseline right-arrow double-struck upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> → </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f:D^n \to \mathbb {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be such that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f left-parenthesis upper D Superscript n Baseline right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f(D^n)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is somewhere dense. We show that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis double-struck upper R comma plus comma dot comma f right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo> ⋅ </mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(\mathbb {R},+,\cdot ,f)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> defines <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper Z"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {Z}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . As an application, we get that for every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="alpha comma beta element-of double-struck upper R Subscript greater-than 0 Baseline"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi> β </mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb {R}_{&gt;0}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="log Subscript alpha Baseline left-parenthesis beta right-parenthesis not-an-element-of double-struck upper Q"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi> β </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo> ∉ </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\log _{\alpha }(\beta )\notin \mathbb {Q}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , the real field expanded by the two cyclic multiplicative subgroups generated by <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="alpha"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\alpha</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="beta"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> β </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\beta</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> defines <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper Z"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207