MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085423471 · doi:10.1109/segah.2011.6165447

Serious games in cognitive training for Alzheimer's patients

2011· article· en· W2085423471 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Games and Gamification
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitive trainingCognitionExploitComputer sciencePopulationSerious gameTraining (meteorology)Video gameCognitive psychologyPsychologyDiseaseMedicineMultimediaPsychiatryComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research on progressive dementia increased significantly in the past years due to the urgency of the aging population. Patients suffering from such dementia, for instance Alzheimer's disease, lose efficiency in cognitive spheres such as memory, planning skills, initiative and perseverance. Some researchers tried to evaluate the potential of close-to-reality simulations and generic video games for brain training to stimulate the cognitive abilities of AD patients. Using recent advances in artificial intelligence such as learning, activity recognition and guidance to enhance this concept of training, we are proposing, in this paper, a detailed explanation of an adapted serious game we designed for this purpose. A prototype has been developed showing how to exploit AI techniques to create an affordable and accessible tool for cognitive training and allowing in-game estimation of the patient's cognitive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Games and GamificationFrench-language works237,207