MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085552858 · doi:10.4161/hv.5.5.7442

Vaccines targeting IgE in the treatment of asthma and allergy

2009· review· en· W2085552858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Vaccines · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmalizumabImmunoglobulin EMedicineAsthmaImmunologyAllergyAnaphylaxisAdverse effectAntibodyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allergic diseases including asthma are characterized by an increase of serum IgE levels. Since IgE was discovered in 1966, it has been considered to be the most important biological target in the treatment of allergy and asthma. Indeed, recent studies reveal that IgE, through its high affinity IgE receptors (FcepsilonRI), is now considered a critical regulator of Th2 responses. This is supported by the great success of the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of allergy and asthma. Nonetheless, adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis, urticaria and serum sickness have been reported with this therapy and repeated injections at extremely high costs are required to maintain effectiveness. To overcome these disadvantages, a new strategy using vaccines against IgE that may offer long-term efficacy with fewer adverse effects is being investigated. This article reviews IgE's role in allergy and asthma, currently used anti-IgE mAb omalizumab, and the advantages, types, effectiveness and development stages of vaccines against IgE. This review also discusses concerns with the vaccine strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it