MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085935099 · doi:10.5354/0719-3769.1970.18808

Notas sobre los aspectos sociales y económicos de los ''regímenes intermedios" : el caso de Bolivia

2012· article· es· W2085935099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios Internacionales · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in Oncology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOligarchyFeudalismIndependence (probability theory)AlliancePolitical scienceAgrarian reformPolitical economyHumanitiesEconomyDemocracySociologyEconomicsGeographyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Intermediate Regimes" are defined as a series of underdeveloped countries that, together with achieving their independence after the Second World War, imposed serious limitations on foreign interests, carried out an agrarian reform, began a process of economic development with a important participation of the government and that, in strict terms, cannot be considered neither capitalist or socialist. An example of this is the case of Indonesia. However, the emergence of an "intermediate regime" in Bolivia in 1952 was different from other countries experiences. The "revolution" under the leadership of Paz Estenssoro took place as a result of the alliance of certain forces opposed to the oligarchy, based on the tin mining companies and the feudal owners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it