MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085991238 · doi:10.1063/1.1842864

High-transmission solid-immersion apertured optical probes for near-field scanning optical microscopy

2004· article· en· W2085991238 on OpenAlexaff
A. Dechant, S. K. Dew, S. E. Irvine, A. Y. Elezzabi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOpticsGallium phosphideMicroscopyNear-field scanning optical microscopeOptical microscopeOptoelectronicsSurface plasmonWavelengthLens (geology)Refractive indexPlasmonScanning electron microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate significantly increased intensity transmission for two hybrid apertured near-field optical probe designs. The probes, based on traditional atomic force microscopy tips, incorporate light-confining mechanisms that yield intensity throughput several orders of magnitude greater than conventional fiber-based probes. A microlayer probe features a high-index gallium phosphide evaporated layer, while a microsphere probe incorporates a silica microsphere lens. The increase in transmitted intensity is attributed to surface plasmon field enhancement effects as well as the decreased wavelength cutoff and focusing effects of the high-index layer and integrated solid-immersion lens, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicNear-Field Optical MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207