MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086110351 · doi:10.3828/idpr.29.4.1

The evolution of community concern about landfills in Vietnam

2007· article· en· W2086110351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Development Planning Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental planningCivil disobedienceBusinessLiberalizationIncentiveValue (mathematics)PoliticsEnvironmentalismPolitical scienceEconomicsGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the mid-1990s, local community concern about the environmental impacts of landfills in Vietnam has been growing and has escalated to civil disobedience in a number of cases. This paper examines some of the root causes for the rise in concern and compares them to those which are found in industrialised countries. These causes include the negative impacts of the landfill and failure to enforce environmental regulations, increases in the value of land use rights, increases in environmental awareness, and political liberalisation. The paper concludes by suggesting several ways to alleviate community concern, including measures that have recently helped to reduce concern somewhat at a few landfills in Vietnam, such as the introduction of improved compensation packages, improved landfill design and management, and compost factories as beneficial on-site ancillary facilities. The use of public participation in both siting and management is also recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it