MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086168102 · doi:10.1002/cjs.10057

Modified weights based generalized quasilikelihood inferences in incomplete longitudinal binary models

2010· article· en· W2086168102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCovariateStatisticsGeneralized estimating equationEstimating equationsRegressionRegression analysisMissing dataCorrelationEconometricsMaximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In an incomplete longitudinal set up, a small number of repeated responses subject to an appropriate missing mechanism along with a set of covariates are collected from a large number of independent individuals over a small period of time. In this set up, the regression effects of the covariates are routinely estimated by solving certain inverse weights based generalized estimating equations. These inverse weights are introduced to make the estimating equation unbiased so that a consistent estimate of the regression parameter vector may be obtained. In the existing studies, these weights are in general formulated conditional on the past responses. Since the past responses follow a correlation structure, the present study reveals that if the longitudinal data subject to missing mechanism are generated by accommodating the longitudinal correlation structure, the conditional weights based on past correlated responses may yield biased and hence inconsistent regression estimates. The bias appears to get larger as the correlation increases. As a remedy, in this paper the authors proposed a modification to the formulation of the existing weights so that weights are not affected directly or indirectly by the correlations. They have then exploited these modified weights to form a weighted generalized quasi‐likelihood estimating equation that yields unbiased and hence consistent estimates for the regression effects irrespective of the magnitude of correlation. The efficiencies of the regression estimates follow due to the use of the true correlation structure as a separate longitudinal weights matrix in the estimating equation. The Canadian Journal of Statistics © 2010 Statistical Society of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it