MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086367991 · doi:10.7202/1016246ar

L’enfant borderline en devenir : pourquoi s’y intéresser?

2013· article· fr· W2086367991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfance en difficulté · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le trouble de personnalité limite (TPL) est une psychopathologie sévère dont les précurseurs remontent à l’enfance. À partir de cette prémisse, l’objectif de cet article est de présenter la controverse qui entoure la présence, dès l’enfance, de traits de personnalité pathologiques reliés au TPL. En effet, bien que le DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2003) déconseille le diagnostic de TPL chez les enfants, d’autres outils diagnostiques soulignent que des traits inadaptés peuvent effectivement être identifiés précocement. Par ailleurs, plusieurs auteurs appuient l’hypothèse selon laquelle le développement des enfants serait compromis par la présence de traits de TPL, faisant d’eux des enfants borderline en devenir. Devant la perspective que les traits inadaptés de l’enfance se maintiennent à l’adolescence et à l’âge adulte, l’article souligne le besoin indispensable de développer des instruments de mesure dimensionnels permettant d’identifier les enfants à risque afin de favoriser les interventions précoces et de renverser le processus développemental pathologique en cours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it