MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086532750 · doi:10.1177/1077546304045577

Linearizing the Equations of Motion for Multibody Systems Using an Orthogonal Complement Method

2005· article· en· W2086532750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJacobian matrix and determinantOrthogonal complementConstraint (computer-aided design)Multibody systemEquations of motionOrthogonal coordinatesMathematicsComplement (music)Generalized coordinatesControl theory (sociology)Coordinate systemStiffness matrixOrthogonal transformationMatrix (chemical analysis)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisStiffnessComputer scienceClassical mechanicsAlgorithmEngineeringPhysicsGeometryStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceSubspace topology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The equations of motion of a multibody system are linearized and reduced to independent coordinates, using an orthogonal complement method. The orthogonal complement is used to eliminate the terms that result from a variation of the constraint forces. The resulting equations contain the derivative of the constraint Jacobian with respect to the coordinate vector in the stiffness matrix. The technique is suitable for a computer implementation. Examples are used to illustrate the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it