Fuzzy Non Linear PI Controller for High Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new technique for controlling different processes with high accuracy and fast response. The techniques is based on a fuzzy logic controller that was found to give better performance than a nonlinear PI compensator while maintaining the characteristics of a conventional PID controller. The approach uses two different control actions based on the feedback error obtained from the process. The error signal is used to determine the control output commands for the two different controller parameters (Kp and KI). This approach gives the system flexibility as well as a fast method for performing the control calculations. Fast response is achieved based on the use of a high proportional gain at the beginning of the process which adjusts to provide a rapid convergence time when reaching the reference position. One of the main advantages of this technique is that it provides a closed form solution describing the controller actions in terms of the tuning parameters. Another advantage is that while other approaches are based on a manual technique for tuning the controller parameters, this one uses optimization techniques. Through these techniques the optimal values of the controller parameters, required to achieve fast response, can be determined while maintaining high accuracy and disturbance rejection. Simulation results of the proposed technique are presented for processes varying from single to five degree of freedom system. The same under damped linear single input single output plant as used by Shahruz and Schwartz (1997) is presented to highlight the improved performance of this new technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".